1. Events
  2. Psycholinguistics Seminar

Views Navigation

Event Views Navigation

Today

LING 264: 264: Joint Psycholinguistics / Computational Seminar

Campbell Hall 2122A/B

We're continuing the combined computational andpsycholinguistics seminar this quarter; areas include language acquisition,computational psycholinguistics, language processing, and others inexperimental and computational linguistics. Anyone interested in these areasand their intersection is invited to attend.  We meet weekly on Thursdays 4-5:30 PM. The schedule isentirely open and can be found here.Our firstmeeting will be an organizational meeting this Thursday,...

LING 264: 264: Joint Psycholinguistics / Computational Seminar

Campbell Hall 2122A/B

We're continuing the combined computational andpsycholinguistics seminar this quarter; areas include language acquisition,computational psycholinguistics, language processing, and others inexperimental and computational linguistics. Anyone interested in these areasand their intersection is invited to attend.  We meet weekly on Thursdays 4-5:30 PM. The schedule isentirely open and can be found here.Our firstmeeting will be an organizational meeting this Thursday,...

LING 264: 264: Joint Psycholinguistics / Computational Seminar

Campbell Hall 2122A/B

We're continuing the combined computational andpsycholinguistics seminar this quarter; areas include language acquisition,computational psycholinguistics, language processing, and others inexperimental and computational linguistics. Anyone interested in these areasand their intersection is invited to attend.  We meet weekly on Thursdays 4-5:30 PM. The schedule isentirely open and can be found here.Our firstmeeting will be an organizational meeting this Thursday,...

LING 264: 264: Joint Psycholinguistics / Computational Seminar

Campbell Hall 2122A/B

We're continuing the combined computational andpsycholinguistics seminar this quarter; areas include language acquisition,computational psycholinguistics, language processing, and others inexperimental and computational linguistics. Anyone interested in these areasand their intersection is invited to attend.  We meet weekly on Thursdays 4-5:30 PM. The schedule isentirely open and can be found here.Our firstmeeting will be an organizational meeting this Thursday,...

LING 264: 264: Joint Psycholinguistics / Computational Seminar

Campbell Hall 2122A/B

We're continuing the combined computational andpsycholinguistics seminar this quarter; areas include language acquisition,computational psycholinguistics, language processing, and others inexperimental and computational linguistics. Anyone interested in these areasand their intersection is invited to attend.  We meet weekly on Thursdays 4-5:30 PM. The schedule isentirely open and can be found here.Our firstmeeting will be an organizational meeting this Thursday,...

Talk with Colloquium speaker: Bob Frank

Conference Room 2122A/B

All members of the Linguistics Department are invited to a bonus talk with Bob Frank about the "Ways of using generative capacity and other formal properties of grammars to assess different varieties of neural networks."

Psycholinguistics Seminar

Conference Room 2122A/B

Psycholing/ Compling Seminar: -Discuss colloquium speaker nominations -Plan schedule for quarter

Psycholing/ Compling Seminar: Jesse Harris practice talk “Let alone ellipsis and the case for enduring default focus: A pupillometry study”

Campbhell Hall 2122

In let alone ellipsis, the remnant typically stands in prosodic contrast with its correlate (e.g., John can’t run a MILE, let alone a MARATHON). To interpret the remnant (a marathon), the processor must locate the contrasting correlate phrase (a mile) in the prior clause from among other same-category competitors. Experimental and corpus research finds that the...

Psycholing/ Compling Seminar: Claire-Moore Cantwell: Gambler’s Fallacy effects in probabilistic wug-test responses

Campbell Hall 2122

Abstract: Participants exhibit the 'gambler's fallacy' in wug-test responses, adjusting their probability of a response based on previous responses. In particular, they avoid giving the same response three times in a row. This effect was strongest when two options were explicitly presented (a 2-alternative forced choice task), and weaker when participants were simply asked to...